PREDICATE RX
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION · LIVE DEMO

The proof without the disclosure.

An interactive demonstration of cryptographic separation in prior authorization. The Separation Predicate™ is construction-independent — it can be instantiated using any sound succinct proof system. This demo uses Groth16 on BN254, the most compact and fastest-verifying option currently available. Each determination is accompanied by a certificate proving — to any third party in milliseconds — that the decision was structurally independent of cost features. You will verify a real certificate in your browser, and you will watch an adversarial prover get rejected by the mathematics.

PREDICATE RX

Prior authorization without the cost-feature problem.

~256B
Certificate size
~10ms
Browser verification
Groth16
Proof system
BN254
Elliptic curve

This demo uses Groth16 / BN254. The Separation Predicate™ is construction-independent — PLONK, Halo2, and STARK instantiations are available for deployments requiring transparent or post-quantum setup.

A LIVE WALKTHROUGH IN FOUR STEPS

Verify a real proof. Reject a tampered one. Watch the adversarial prover fail.

The Separation Predicate™ is construction-independent: any sound succinct proof system (Groth16, PLONK, Halo2, STARKs) can instantiate it. This demo uses Groth16 on BN254 — the smallest proof size and fastest verification currently available. Certificates are produced by a real trusted-setup ceremony and verified in your browser via snarkjs. No backend, no telemetry, no signup.

STEP 01
Choose a case
STEP 02
Inspect the partition, then run a prover
WHAT YOU JUST WITNESSED

Three properties that organizational attestation cannot deliver, and that the cryptography does.

01

Verification without cooperation.

The verification ran in your browser, with no access to our infrastructure, our model, or the patient record. Anyone holding the public verification key can verify any certificate the system produces. The trust never moves.

02

Tamper-evident at the bit level.

Modifying a single byte of the public record invalidates the certificate. A common allegation in prior-authorization litigation — that records were edited after the fact — is structurally refuted: the certificate either verifies on the original record, or it does not.

03

The adversarial prover cannot issue.

This is the structural distinction between policy and physics. Policy can be revised under pressure or worked around by a sufficiently motivated insider. The cryptographic constraint cannot. When separation is violated, no witness satisfies the circuit, and no proof can be generated.

NEXT STEPS

Run it yourself, or talk to us.

The code is open and self-contained. A prospect's engineering team can clone the repository, install the toolchain, and reproduce every claim on their own laptop in under an hour. For a deployment scoping discussion, we are reachable directly.

Request a deployment review Platform & solutions Read the white papers